IPCC. Mitigation of Climate Change Climate Change 2022 Working Group III Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2022).
Zahasky, C. & Krevor, S. Global geologic carbon storage requirements of climate change mitigation scenarios. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 1561–1567 (2020).
Watson, R. T., Zinyowera, M. C., Moss, R. H. & Dokken, D. J. Climate Change 1995. Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 1996).
Snæbjörnsdóttir, S. et al. Carbon dioxide storage through mineral carbonation. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 90–102 (2020).
Ringrose, P. How to Store CO2 Underground: Insights from Early-Mover CCS Projects (Springer International Publishing, 2020).
Zhang, Y., Jackson, C. & Krevor, S. An estimate of the amount of geological CO2 storage over the period of 1996–2020. Env. Sci. Technol. Lett. 9, 693–698 (2022).
Abdulla, A., Hanna, R., Schell, K. R., Babacan, O. & Victor, D. G. Explaining successful and failed investments in U.S. carbon capture and storage using empirical and expert assessments. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 014036 (2021).
Jackson, S. J. & Krevor, S. Small-scale capillary heterogeneity linked to rapid plume migration during CO2 storage. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL088616 (2020).
Pettersson, P., Tveit, S. & Gasda, S. E. Dynamic estimates of extreme-case CO2 storage capacity for basin-scale heterogeneous systems under geological uncertainty. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 116, 103613 (2022).
Lee, K.-K. et al. Managing injection-induced seismic risks. Science 364, 730–732 (2019).
Hepple, R. P. & Benson, S. M. Geologic storage of carbon dioxide as a climate change mitigation strategy: performance requirements and the implications of surface seepage. Environ. Geol. 47, 576–585 (2005).
Lord, A. S. Overview of Geologic Storage of Natural Gas with an Emphasis on Assessing the Feasibility Storing Hydrogen (eds Bui, M. & Mac Dowell, N.) (OSTI, 2009); https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/975258-OsnNqC/
Benson, S. M. & Cole, D. R. CO2 sequestration in deep sedimentary formations. Elements 4, 325–331 (2008).
Krevor, S., Blunt, M. J., Trusler, J. P. M. & de Simone, S. An introduction to subsurface CO2 storage. in RSC Energy and Environment Series, Vols 2020, Ch. 8, 238–295 (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2020).
Bachu, S. Screening and ranking of sedimentary basins for sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change. Environ. Geol. 44, 277–289 (2003).
Orr, F. M. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage: an update. SPE J. 23, 2444–2455 (2018).
Edwards, R. W. J. & Celia, M. A. Infrastructure to enable deployment of carbon capture, utilization, and storage in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E8815–E8824 (2018).
Alcalde, J. et al. Acorn: developing full-chain industrial carbon capture and storage in a resource- and infrastructure-rich hydrocarbon province. J. Clean. Prod. 233, 963–971 (2019).
Loizzo, M., Lecampion, B., Bérard, T., Harichandran, A. & Jammes, L. Reusing O&G-depleted reservoirs for CO2 storage: pros and cons. SPE Proj. Fac. Const. 5, 166–172 (2010).
Hannis, S. et al. in Energy Procedia Vol. 114 (eds Dixon, T. et al.) 5680–5690 (Elsevier Ltd, 2017).
Raza, A. et al. CO2 storage in depleted gas reservoirs: a study on the effect of residual gas saturation. Petroleum 4, 95–107 (2018).
Lloyd, C., Huuse, M., Barrett, B. J. & Newton, A. M. W. Regional exploration and characterisation of CO2 storage prospects in the Utsira-Skade Aquifer, North Viking Graben, North Sea. Earth Sci. Syst. Soc. https://doi.org/10.3389/esss.2021.10041 (2021).
Ringrose, P. S. et al. Storage of carbon dioxide in saline aquifers: physicochemical processes, key constraints, and scale-up potential. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 12, 471–494 (2021).
Allen, P. A. & Allen, J. R. Basin Analysis: Principles and Application to Petroleum Play Assessment (John Wiley & Sons, 2013).
Wu, L. et al. Significance of fault seal in assessing CO2 storage capacity and containment risks — an example from the Horda Platform, Northern North Sea. Pet. Geosci. 27, petgeo2020-102 (2021).
Ringrose, P. & Bentley, M. Reservoir Model Design: A Practitioner’s Guide 2nd edn (Springer, 2021).
Miocic, J. M., Johnson, G. & Bond, C. E. Uncertainty in fault seal parameters: implications for CO2 column height retention and storage capacity in geological CO2 storage projects. Solid Earth 10, 951–967 (2019).
Roberts, J. J. et al. in Geological Society Special Publication Vol. 458 (eds Turner, J. P. et al.) 181–211 (Geological Society of London, 2017).
Sun, X. et al. Appraisal of CO2 storage potential in compressional hydrocarbon-bearing basins: global assessment and case study in the Sichuan Basin (China). Geosci. Front. 11, 2309–2321 (2020).
Sun, X. et al. Hubs and clusters approach to unlock the development of carbon capture and storage — case study in Spain. Appl. Energy 300, 117418 (2021).
Equinor. Northern Lights FEED Report RE-PM673-00057 (2020).
Shell Canada Energy. Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Project Annual Summary Report — Alberta Department of Energy 2020 (2021).
Grude, S., Landrø, M. & Dvorkin, J. Pressure effects caused by CO2 injection in the Tubåen Fm., the Snøhvit field. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 27, 178–187 (2014).
Chevron. Gorgon Project. Carbon Dioxide Injection Project. Low Emissions Technology Demonstration Fund. Annual Report. 1 July 2020–30 June 2021 (2022).
Huppert, H. E. & Neufeld, J. A. The fluid mechanics of carbon dioxide sequestration. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 255–272 (2014).
Szulczewski, M. L., MacMinn, C. W., Herzog, H. J. & Juanes, R. Lifetime of carbon capture and storage as a climate-change mitigation technology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5185–5189 (2012).
Krevor, S. et al. Capillary trapping for geologic carbon dioxide storage — from pore scale physics to field scale implications. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 40, 221–237 (2015).
Krevor, S. C. M., Pini, R., Li, B. & Benson, S. M. Capillary heterogeneity trapping of CO2 in a sandstone rock at reservoir conditions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, GL048239 (2011).
Hesse, M. A. & Woods, A. W. Buoyant dispersal of CO2 during geological storage. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, 2009GL041128 (2010).
Hesse, M. A., Orr, F. M. & Tchelepi, H. A. Gravity currents with residual trapping. J. Fluid Mech. 611, 35–60 (2008).
Popik, S. et al. 4D surface seismic monitoring the evolution of a small CO2 plume during and after injection: CO2CRC Otway Project study. Explor. Geophys. 51, 570–580 (2020).
Nordbotten, J. M. & Celia, M. Geological Storage of CO2. Modeling Approaches for Large-Scale Simulation (Wiley, 2012).
Riaz, A. & Tchelepi, H. A. Influence of relative permeability on the stability characteristics of immiscible flow in porous media. Transp. Porous Media 64, 315–338 (2006).
Neufeld, J. A. et al. Convective dissolution of carbon dioxide in saline aquifers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, 2010GL044728 (2010).
Gilmore, K. A., Neufeld, J. A. & Bickle, M. J. CO2 dissolution trapping rates in heterogeneous porous media. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, 2020GL087001 (2020).
Gasda, S. E., Nordbotten, J. M. & Celia, M. A. Vertically averaged approaches for CO2 migration with solubility trapping. Water Resour. Res. 47, 5528 (2011).
Macminn, C. W. & Juanes, R. Buoyant currents arrested by convective dissolution. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 2017–2022 (2013).
Sathaye, K. J., Hesse, M. A., Cassidy, M. & Stockli, D. F. Constraints on the magnitude and rate of CO2 dissolution at Bravo Dome natural gas field. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15332–15337 (2014).
Nordbotten, J. M., Kavetski, D., Celia, M. A. & Bachu, S. Model for CO2 leakage including multiple geological layers and multiple leaky wells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 743–749 (2009).
Gilmore, K. A., Sahu, C. K., Benham, G. P., Neufeld, J. A. & Bickle, M. J. Leakage dynamics of fault zones: Experimental and analytical study with application to CO2 storage. J. Fluid Mech. 931, 359–380 (2022).
Alcalde, J. et al. Estimating geological CO2 storage security to deliver on climate mitigation. Nat. Commun. 9, 2201 (2018).
Jones, D. G. et al. Developments since 2005 in understanding potential environmental impacts of CO2 leakage from geological storage. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 40, 350–377 (2015).
Benham, G. P., Bickle, M. J. & Neufeld, J. A. Two-phase gravity currents in layered porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 922, 523 (2021).
Boon, M. & Benson, S. M. A physics-based model to predict the impact of horizontal lamination on CO2 plume migration. Adv. Water Resour. 150, 103881 (2021).
Bickle, M., Chadwick, A., Huppert, H. E., Hallworth, M. & Lyle, S. Modelling carbon dioxide accumulation at Sleipner: implications for underground carbon storage. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 255, 164–176 (2007).
Verdon, J. P. et al. Comparison of geomechanical deformation induced by megatonne-scale CO2 storage at Sleipner, Weyburn, and In Salah. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E2762-71 (2013).
Cowton, L. R. et al. Benchmarking of vertically-integrated CO2 flow simulations at the Sleipner Field, North Sea. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 491, 121–133 (2018).
Hodneland, E. et al. Effect of temperature and concentration of impurities in the fluid stream on CO2 migration in the Utsira formation. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 83, 20–28 (2019).
Ellsworth, W. L. Injection-induced earthquakes. Science 341, 1225942 (2013).
Grigoli, F. et al. Current challenges in monitoring, discrimination, and management of induced seismicity related to underground industrial activities: a European perspective. Rev. Geophys. 55, 310–340 (2017).
National Research Council. Induced Seismicity Potential in Energy Technologies (The National Academies Press., 2013).
Raleigh, C. B., Healy, J. H. & Bredehoeft, J. D. An experiment in earthquake control at Rangely, Colorado. Science 191, 1230–1237 (1976).
Healy, J. H., Rubey, W. W., Griggs, D. T. & Raleigh, C. B. The Denver earthquakes. Science 161, 1301–1310 (1968).
Segall, P. Earthquakes triggered by fluid extraction. Geology 17, 942–946 (1989).
Gan, W. & Frohlich, C. Gas injection may have triggered earthquakes in the Cogdell oil field, Texas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18786–18791 (2013).
Cesca, S. et al. The 2013 September–October seismic sequence offshore Spain: a case of seismicity triggered by gas injection? Geophys. J. Int. 198, 941–953 (2014).
Brodsky, E. E. & Lajoie, L. J. Anthropogenic seismicity rates and operational parameters at the Salton Sea Geothermal Field. Science 341, 543–546 (2013).
Amos, C. B. et al. Uplift and seismicity driven by groundwater depletion in central California. Nature 509, 483–486 (2014).
Zoback, M. D. & Gorelick, S. M. Earthquake triggering and large-scale geologic storage of carbon dioxide. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 109, 10164–10168 (2012).
Jha, B. & Juanes, R. Coupled multiphase flow and poromechanics: a computational model of pore pressure effects on fault slip and earthquake triggering. Water Resour. Res. 50, 3776–3808 (2014).
White, J. A. & Foxall, W. Assessing induced seismicity risk at CO2 storage projects: recent progress and remaining challenges. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 49, 413–424 (2016).
Scholz, C. H. Earthquakes and friction laws. Nature 391, 37–42 (1998).
Candela, T. et al. Depletion-induced seismicity at the Groningen gas field: Coulomb rate-and-state models including differential compaction effect. J. Geophys. Res. Solid. Earth 124, 7081–7104 (2019).
van der Baan, M. Earthquakes triggered by underground fluid injection modelled for a tectonically active oil field. Nature 595, 655–656 (2021).
Zhai, G., Shirzaei, M., Manga, M. & Chen, X. Pore-pressure diffusion, enhanced by poroelastic stresses, controls induced seismicity in Oklahoma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 16228–16233 (2019).
McGarr, A. et al. Coping with earthquakes induced by fluid injection. Science 347, 830–831 (2015).
Watkins, T. J. M., Verdon, J. P. & Rodríguez-Pradilla, G. The Temporal Evolution of Induced Seismicity Sequences Generated by Long-term, Low Pressure Fluid Injection. Preprint at https://www1.gly.bris.ac.uk/~gljpv/PDFS/Watkins_etal_Preprint.pdf.
Keranen, K. M., Weingarten, M., Abers, G. A., Bekins, B. A. & Ge, S. Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection. Science 345, 448–451 (2014).
Weingarten, M., Ge, S., Godt, J. W., Bekins, B. A. & Rubinstein, J. L. High-rate injection is associated with the increase in US midcontinent seismicity. Science 348, 1336–1340 (2015).
Tang, L., Lu, Z., Zhang, M., Sun, L. & Wen, L. Seismicity induced by simultaneous abrupt changes of injection rate and well pressure in Hutubi Gas Field. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123, 5929–5944 (2018).
Alghannam, M. & Juanes, R. Understanding rate effects in injection-induced earthquakes. Nat. Commun. 11, 3053 (2020).
Linker, M. F. & Dieterich, J. H. Effects of variable normal stress on rock friction: observations and constitutive equations. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 4923–4940 (1992).
Olsson, W. A. The effects of normal stress history on rock friction — Paper ARMA-88-0111. in The 29th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (eds Cundall, P. A. et al) 111 – 117 (USRMS, 1988).
Increasing Rate of Earthquakes Beginning in 2009. USGS https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/increasing-rate-earthquakes-beginning-2009 (2009).
Chen, Z., Narayan, S. P., Yang, Z. & Rahman, S. S. An experimental investigation of hydraulic behaviour of fractures and joints in granitic rock. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 37, 1061–1071 (2000).
Ikari, M. J., Saffer, D. M. & Marone, C. Frictional and hydrologic properties of clay-rich fault gouge. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 114, 2008JB006089 (2009).
Bürgmann, R. The geophysics, geology and mechanics of slow fault slip. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 495, 112–134 (2018).
Juanes, R., Hager, B. H. & Herzog, H. J. No geologic evidence that seismicity causes fault leakage that would render large-scale carbon capture and storage unsuccessful. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E3623 (2012).
Ringrose, P. S. & Meckel, T. A. Maturing global CO2 storage resources on offshore continental margins to achieve 2DS emissions reductions. Sci. Rep. 9, 17944 (2019).
Baisch, S., Koch, C. & Muntendam-Bos, A. Traffic light systems: to what extent can induced seismicity be controlled? Seismol. Res. Lett. 90, 1145–1154 (2019).
Hager, B. H. et al. A process-based approach to understanding and managing triggered seismicity. Nature 595, 684–689 (2021).
Heinemann, N. et al. Enabling large-scale hydrogen storage in porous media — the scientific challenges. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 853–864 (2021).
Kabuth, A. et al. Energy storage in the geological subsurface: dimensioning, risk analysis and spatial planning: the ANGUS+ project. Environ. Earth Sci. 76, 23 (2017).
Heinemann, N. et al. Hydrogen storage in saline aquifers: The role of cushion gas for injection and production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46, 39284–39296 (2021).
Amid, A., Mignard, D. & Wilkinson, M. Seasonal storage of hydrogen in a depleted natural gas reservoir. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 41, 5549–5558 (2016).
Lemmon, E. W., Bell, I. H., Huber, M. L. & McLinden, M. O. in NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69 (eds Linstrom, P. J. & Mallard, W. G.) (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2022).
Tarkowski, R., Uliasz-Misiak, B. & Tarkowski, P. Storage of hydrogen, natural gas, and carbon dioxide — geological and legal conditions. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46, 20010–20022 (2021).
Caglayan, D. G. et al. Technical potential of salt caverns for hydrogen storage in Europe. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45, 6793–6805 (2020).
Tarkowski, R. Underground hydrogen storage: characteristics and prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 105, 86–94 (2019).
Hashemi, L., Blunt, M. & Hajibeygi, H. Pore-scale modelling and sensitivity analyses of hydrogen-brine multiphase flow in geological porous media. Sci. Rep. 11, 8348 (2021).
Simon, J., Ferriz, A. M. & Correas, L. C. HyUnder — hydrogen underground storage at large scale: case study Spain. in Energy Procedia Vol. 73, 136–144 (Elsevier Ltd, 2015).
Carroll, S. et al. Review: role of chemistry, mechanics, and transport on well integrity in CO2 storage environments. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 49, 149–160 (2016).
Ramesh Kumar, K., Makhmutov, A., Spiers, C. J. & Hajibeygi, H. Geomechanical simulation of energy storage in salt formations. Sci. Rep. 11, 19640 (2021).
Kaldi, J. et al. Containment of CO2 in CCS: role of caprocks and faults. in Energy Procedia Vol. 37, 5403–5410 (Elsevier Ltd, 2013).
Hafsi, Z., Mishra, M. & Elaoud, S. Hydrogen embrittlement of steel pipelines during transients. in Procedia Structural Integrity Vol. 13, 210–217 (Elsevier B.V., 2018).
Miri, R. & Hellevang, H. Salt precipitation during CO2 storage — a review. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 51, 136–147 (2016).
Dopffel, N., Jansen, S. & Gerritse, J. Microbial side effects of underground hydrogen storage — knowledge gaps, risks and opportunities for successful implementation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46, 8594–8606 (2021).
Thaysen, E. M. et al. Estimating microbial growth and hydrogen consumption in hydrogen storage in porous media. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 151, 111481 (2021).
Griffiths, S., Sovacool, B. K., Kim, J., Bazilian, M. & Uratani, J. M. Industrial decarbonization via hydrogen: a critical and systematic review of developments, socio-technical systems and policy options. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 80, 102208 (2021).
Glanz, S. & Schönauer, A. L. Towards a low-carbon society via hydrogen and carbon capture and storage: social acceptance from a stakeholder perspective. J. Sustain. Dev. Energy Water Environ. Syst. 9, 1–18 (2021).
Lambert, V. & Ashworth, P. The Australian PUBLIC’S Perception of Hydrogen for Energy (ARENA, 2018).
Gough, C. & Mander, S. Beyond social acceptability: applying lessons from CCS social science to support deployment of BECCS. Curr. Sustain. Renew. Energy Rep. 6, 116–123 (2019).
Stalker, L., Roberts, J., Mabon, L. & Hartley, P. Communicating leakage risk in the hydrogen economy: lessons already learned from geoenergy industries. Front. Energy Res. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.869264 (2022).
IPCC. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (UN, 1992); https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf.
IPCC Climate Change 2018: Global Warming of 1.5°C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge University Press and New York, 2018).
Mikunda, T. et al. Carbon capture and storage and the sustainable development goals. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 108, 103318 (2021).
Herzog, H. J. & Drake, E. M. Carbon dioxide recovery and disposal from large energy systems. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.21.1.145 (1996).
Hetland, J. & Anantharaman, R. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) options for co-production of electricity and synthetic fuels from indigenous coal in an Indian context. Energy Sustain. Dev. 13, 56–63 (2009).
Audus, E. I. H. IEA greenhouse gas R&D programme: full fuel cycle studies. Energy Convers. Manag. 37, 837–842 (1996).
Mathieu, P. Near Zero Emission Power Plants as Future CO2 Control Technologies (Springer, 2002).
Swennenhuis, F., de Gooyert, V. & de Coninck, H. Towards a CO2-neutral steel industry: justice aspects of CO2 capture and storage, biomass- and green hydrogen-based emission reductions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 88, 102598 (2022).
Volkart, K., Bauer, C. & Boulet, C. Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and storage in power generation and industry in Europe. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 16, 91–106 (2013).
Pehnt, M. & Henkel, J. Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide capture and storage from lignite power plants. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 3, 49–66 (2009).
Pawar, R. J. et al. The National Risk Assessment Partnership’s integrated assessment model for carbon storage: a tool to support decision making amidst uncertainty. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 52, 175–189 (2016).
Kang, M. et al. Identification and characterization of high methane-emitting abandoned oil and gas wells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13636–13641 (2016).
Davies, R. J. et al. Oil and gas wells and their integrity: implications for shale and unconventional resource exploitation. Mar. Pet. Geol. 56, 239–254 (2014).
Shell UK Limited. Peterhead CCS Project Cost Estimate Report, Doc. No. PCCS-00-MM-FA-3101-00001 (2016).
Shaffer, G. Long-term effectiveness and consequences of carbon dioxide sequestration. Nat. Geosci. 3, 464–467 (2010).
Haugan, P. M. & Joos, F. Metrics to assess the mitigation of global warming by carbon capture and storage in the ocean and in geological reservoirs. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, 2004GL020295 (2004).
EPA. Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Class VI Implementation Manual for UIC Program Directors (2018).
Heidug, W., Lipponen, J., McCoy, S. & Benoit, P. Storing CO2 through enhanced oil recovery: combining EOR with CO2 storage (EOR+) for profit. in Insight Series (International Energy Agency, 2015).
Kolster, C., Masnadi, M. S., Krevor, S., Mac Dowell, N. & Brandt, A. R. CO2 enhanced oil recovery: a catalyst for gigatonne-scale carbon capture and storage deployment? Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 2594–2608 (2017).
Hepburn, C. et al. The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal. Nature 575, 87–97 (2019).
Jaramillo, P., Griffin, W. M. & Mccoy, S. T. Life cycle inventory of CO2 in an enhanced oil recovery system. Env. Sci. Technol. 43, 8027–8032 (2009).
Cooney, G., Littlefield, J., Marriott, J. & Skone, T. J. Evaluating the climate benefits of CO2-enhanced oil recovery using life cycle analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 7491–7500 (2015).
Sminchak, J. R., Mawalkar, S. & Gupta, N. Large CO2 storage volumes result in net negative emissions for greenhouse gas life cycle analysis based on records from 22 years of CO2-enhanced oil recovery operations. Energy Fuels 34, 3566–3577 (2020).
Stewart, R. J. & Haszeldine, R. S. Can producing oil store carbon? Greenhouse gas footprint of CO2EOR, offshore North Sea. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 5788–5795 (2015).
Núñez-López, V. & Moskal, E. Potential of CO2-EOR for near-term decarbonization. Front. Clim. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2019.00005 (2019).
Alcalde, J. et al. Acorn: developing full-chain industrial carbon capture and storage in a resource- and infrastructure-rich hydrocarbon province. J. Clean. Prod. 233, 963–971 (2019).
Mabon, L., Kita, J. & Xue, Z. Challenges for social impact assessment in coastal regions: a case study of the Tomakomai CCS Demonstration Project. Mar. Policy 83, 243–251 (2017).
Ashworth, P., Wade, S., Reiner, D. & Liang, X. Developments in public communications on CCS. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 40, 449–458 (2015).
Haug, J. K. & Stigson, P. Local acceptance and communication as crucial elements for realizing CCS in the Nordic region. in Energy Procedia Vol. 86, 315–323 (Elsevier Ltd, 2016).
Akerboom, S. et al. Different this time? The prospects of CCS in the Netherlands in the 2020s. Front. Energy Res. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.644796 (2021).
Brunsting, S., De Best-Waldhober, M., Feenstra, C. F. J. & Mikunda, T. Stakeholder participation practices and onshore CCS: lessons from the Dutch CCS case Barendrecht. in Energy Procedia Vol. 4, 6376–6383 (Elsevier Ltd, 2011).
van Egmond, S. & Hekkert, M. P. Analysis of a prominent carbon storage project failure — the role of the national government as initiator and decision maker in the Barendrecht case. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 34, 1–11 (2015).
Whitmarsh, L., Xenias, D. & Jones, C. R. Framing effects on public support for carbon capture and storage. Palgrave Commun. 5, 17 (2019).
Pianta, S., Rinscheid, A. & Weber, E. U. Carbon capture and storage in the United States: perceptions, preferences, and lessons for policy. Energy Policy 151, 112149 (2021).
Ostfeld, R. & Reiner, D. M. Public views of Scotland’s path to decarbonization: evidence from citizens’ juries and focus groups. Energy Policy 140, 111332 (2020).
Carbon Capture Usage and Storage Public Dialogue (UK Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2021).
Merk, C., Nordø, Å. D., Andersen, G., Lægreid, O. M. & Tvinnereim, E. Don’t send us your waste gases: public attitudes toward international carbon dioxide transportation and storage in Europe. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 87, 102450 (2022).
Gonzalez, A., Mabon, L. & Agarwal, A. Who wants North Sea CCS, and why? Assessing differences in opinion between oil and gas industry respondents and wider energy and environmental stakeholders. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 106, 103288 (2021).
Dütschke, E. et al. Differences in the public perception of CCS in Germany depending on CO2 source, transport option and storage location. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 53, 149–159 (2016).
Buck, H. J. Social science for the next decade of carbon capture and storage. Electr. J. 34, 107003 (2021).
L’Orange Seigo, S., Dohle, S. & Siegrist, M. Public perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS): a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 38, 848–863 (2014).
Broecks, K., Jack, C., ter Mors, E., Boomsma, C. & Shackley, S. How do people perceive carbon capture and storage for industrial processes? Examining factors underlying public opinion in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 81, 102236 (2021).
Tcvetkov, P., Cherepovitsyn, A. & Fedoseev, S. Public perception of carbon capture and storage: a state-of-the-art overview. Heliyon 5, e02845 (2019).
Chen, Z.-A. et al. A large national survey of public perceptions of CCS technology in China. Appl. Energy 158, 366–377 (2015).
Vercelli, S. et al. Topic and concerns related to the potential impacts of CO2 storage: results from a Stakeholders Questionnaire. Energy Procedia 114, 7379–7398 (2017).
de Coninck, H. Trojan horse or horn of plenty? Reflections on allowing CCS in the CDM. Energy Policy 36, 929–936 (2008).
Cox, E., Spence, E. & Pidgeon, N. Public perceptions of carbon dioxide removal in the United States and the United Kingdom. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 744–749 (2020).
Vergragt, P. J., Markusson, N. & Karlsson, H. Carbon capture and storage, bio-energy with carbon capture and storage, and the escape from the fossil-fuel lock-in. Global Environ. Change 21, 282–292 (2011).
Gough, C., Cunningham, R. & Mander, S. Understanding key elements in establishing a social license for CCS: an empirical approach. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 68, 16–25 (2018).
Gough, C., Cunningham, R. & Mander, S. Societal responses to CO2 storage in the UK: media, stakeholder and public perspectives. Energy Procedia 114, 7310–7316 (2017).
Janipour, Z., Swennenhuis, F., de Gooyert, V. & de Coninck, H. Understanding contrasting narratives on carbon dioxide capture and storage for Dutch industry using system dynamics. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 105, 103235 (2021).
Hansson, A., Anshelm, J., Fridahl, M. & Haikola, S. The underworld of tomorrow? How subsurface carbon dioxide storage leaked out of the public debate. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 90, 102606 (2022).
Dowd, A. M., Rodriguez, M. & Jeanneret, T. Social science insights for the BioCCS industry. Energies 8, 4024–4042 (2015).
Havercroft, I., Macrory, R. & Stewart, R. B. Carbon Capture and Storage: Emerging Legal and Regulatory Issues (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018).
Ghaleigh, N. S. in Encyclopedia of Environmental Law: Climate Change Law Vol. 1 (eds Farber, D. A. & Peeters, M.) (Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2016).
European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide (2009).
Benson, S. M. et al. Carbon capture and storage. in Global Energy Assessment — Toward a Sustainable Future (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Baines, S. et al. CO2 storage resource catalogue cycle 3 report, Oil and Gas Climate Initiative (Global CCS Institute, 2022).
Specifications for the Application of the United Nations Classification for Fossil Energy and Mineral Reserves and Resources 2009 to Injection Projects for the Purpose of Geological Storage. UNECE https://unece.org/sustainable-energy/unfc-and-sustainable-resource-management/unfc-documents (2016).
Society of Petroleum Engineers. CO2 Storage Resources Management System (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2017).
Duong, C., Bower, C., Hume, K., Rock, L. & Tessarolo, S. Quest carbon capture and storage offset project: findings and learnings from 1st reporting period. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 89, 65–75 (2019).
Dean, M. & Tucker, O. A risk-based framework for measurement, monitoring and verification (MMV) of the Goldeneye storage complex for the Peterhead CCS project, UK. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 61, 1–15 (2017).
Ringrose, P. S. The CCS hub in Norway: some insights from 22 years of saline aquifer storage. in Energy Procedia Vol. 146, 166–172 (Elsevier Ltd, 2018).
Equinor. Northern Lights FEED Report, RE-PM673-00057 (2020).
Akhurst, M. et al. Storage Readiness Levels: communicating the maturity of site technical understanding, permitting and planning needed for storage operations using CO2. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 110, 103402 (2021).
National Energy Technology Laboratory. Best Practices: Site Screening, Site Selection, and Site Characterization for Geologic Storage Projects. DOE/NETL-2017/1844 (2017).
Barros, E. G. D., Leeuwenburgh, O. & Szklarz, S. P. Quantitative assessment of monitoring strategies for conformance verification of CO2 storage projects. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 110, 103403 (2021).
Bourne, S., Crouch, S. & Smith, M. A risk-based framework for measurement, monitoring and verification of the Quest CCS Project, Alberta, Canada. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 26, 109–126 (2014).
Tveit, S., Mannseth, T., Park, J., Sauvin, G. & Agersborg, R. Combining CSEM or gravity inversion with seismic AVO inversion, with application to monitoring of large-scale CO2 injection. Comput. Geosci. 24, 1201–1220 (2020).
Pevzner, R. et al. Seismic monitoring of a small CO2 injection using a multi-well DAS array: operations and initial results of Stage 3 of the CO2CRC Otway project. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 110, 103437 (2021).
Chopra, S. & Castagna, J. P. AVO (Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2014).
Furre, A. K., Eiken, O., Alnes, H., Vevatne, J. N. & Kiær, A. F. 20 years of monitoring CO2-injection at Sleipner. in Energy Procedia Vol. 114, 3916–3926 (Elsevier Ltd, 2017).
Mykkeltvedt, T. S. & Nordbotten, J. M. Estimating effective rates of convective mixing from commercial-scale injection. Environ. Earth Sci. 67, 527–535 (2012).
Moghadasi, R., Basirat, F., Bensabat, J., Doughty, C. & Niemi, A. Role of critical gas saturation in the interpretation of a field scale CO2 injection experiment. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 115, 103624 (2022).
Pawar, R. J. et al. Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO2 storage. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 40, 292–311 (2015).
Nicol, A., Carne, R., Gerstenberger, M. & Christophersen, A. Induced seismicity and its implications for CO2 storage risk. in Energy Procedia Vol. 4, 3699–3706 (Elsevier Ltd, 2011).
Guglielmi, Y. et al. Field-scale fault reactivation experiments by fluid injection highlight aseismic leakage in caprock analogs: implications for CO2 sequestration. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 111, 103471 (2021).
Duguid, A. et al. Practical leakage risk assessment for CO2 assisted enhanced oil recovery and geologic storage in Ohio’s depleted oil fields. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 109, 103338 (2021).
de Coninck, H. & Benson, S. M. Carbon dioxide capture and storage: issues and prospects. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39, 243–270 (2014).
Dean, M., Blackford, J., Connelly, D. & Hines, R. Insights and guidance for offshore CO2 storage monitoring based on the QICS, ETI MMV, and STEMM-CCS projects. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 100, 103120 (2020).
Waage, M. et al. Feasibility of using the P-cable high-resolution 3D seismic system in detecting and monitoring CO2 leakage. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 106, 103240 (2021).
Glubokovskikh, S. et al. How well can time-lapse seismic characterize a small CO2 leakage into a saline aquifer: CO2CRC Otway 2C experiment (Victoria, Australia). Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 92, 102854 (2020).
BP Exploration Operating Company Limited. Multi-Store Development Philosophy. Key Knowledge Document NS051-SS-PHI-000-00010 (2022).
de Simone, S. & Krevor, S. A tool for first order estimates and optimisation of dynamic storage resource capacity in saline aquifers. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 106, 103258 (2021).
Birkholzer, J. T. & Zhou, Q. Basin-scale hydrogeologic impacts of CO2 storage: capacity and regulatory implications. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 3, 745–756 (2009).
Bandilla, K. W. & Celia, M. A. Active pressure management through brine production for basin-wide deployment of geologic carbon sequestration. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 61, 155–167 (2017).
Birkholzer, J. T., Cihan, A. & Zhou, Q. Impact-driven pressure management via targeted brine extraction — conceptual studies of CO2 storage in saline formations. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 7, 168–180 (2012).
Cihan, A., Birkholzer, J. T. & Bianchi, M. Optimal well placement and brine extraction for pressure management during CO2 sequestration. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 42, 175–187 (2015).
Gasda, S. E., Wangen, M., Bjørnarå, T. I. & Elenius, M. T. Investigation of caprock integrity due to pressure build-up during high-volume injection into the Utsira formation. in Energy Procedia Vol. 114, 3157–3166 (Elsevier Ltd, 2017).
Elenius, M. et al. Assessment of CO2 storage capacity based on sparse data: Skade formation. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 79, 252–271 (2018).
Martin-Roberts, E. et al. Carbon capture and storage at the end of a lost decade. One Earth 4, 1569–1584 (2021).
Wang, N., Akimoto, K. & Nemet, G. F. What went wrong? Learning from three decades of carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS) pilot and demonstration projects. Energy Policy 158, 112456 (2021).
Smith, E. et al. The cost of CO2 transport and storage in global integrated assessment modeling. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 109, 103367 (2021).
Rubin, E. S., Davison, J. E. & Herzog, H. J. The cost of CO2 capture and storage. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 40, 378–400 (2015).
Morgan, D. & Grant, T. FE/NETL CO2 Saline Storage Cost Model: Model Description and Baseline Results, DOE/NETL-2014/1659 (2014).
ACT Acorn. D08 East Mey CO2 Storage Site Development Plan (2018).
Torp, T. & Brown, K. CO2 underground storage costs as experienced at Sleipner and Weyburn. in Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Vol. 7, 531–538 (Elsevier, 2005).
Short-Term Actions & Transition Strategies. National Petroleum Council www.npc.org (2019).
Leeson, D., Mac Dowell, N., Shah, N., Petit, C. & Fennell, P. S. A techno-economic analysis and systematic review of carbon capture and storage (CCS) applied to the iron and steel, cement, oil refining and pulp and paper industries, as well as other high purity sources. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 61, 71–84 (2017).
Herzog, H. Lessons Learned CCS Demonstration and Large Pilot Projects. An MIT Energy Initiative Working Paper. MIT http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/index.html (2016).
Whitmore, A. Contracts to support deployment of carbon capture. In Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS): Barriers, Enabling Frameworks and Prospects for Climate Change Mitigation Oxford Energy Forum 130, 13–16 (2022).
Rassool, D., Consoli, C., Townsend, A. & Liu, H. Overview of Organisations and Policies Supporting the Deployment of Large-Scale CCS Facilities (Global CCS Institute, 2020).
Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. Longship — Carbon Capture and Storage. Meld. St. 33 (2019-2020) Report to the Storting (White Paper) (2020).
UK Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy. Carbon Capture Usage and Storage: An Update on the Business Model for Transport and Storage (2021).
Global CCS Institute. Global Status of CCS 2021: CCS Accelerating to Net Zero (2021).
Finley, R. J. An overview of the Illinois Basin — Decatur Project. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 4, 571–579 (2014).
CCUS in Industry and Transformation. IEA https://www.iea.org/reports/ccus-in-industry-and-transformation (2022).
Class VI Wells Permitted by EPA. EPA https://www.epa.gov/uic/class-vi-wells-permitted-epa (2022).
Huppmann, D., Rogelj, J., Kriegler, E., Krey, V. & Riahi, K. A new scenario resource for integrated 1.5 °C research. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 1027–1030 (2018).
European Commission. A Clean Planet for All COM(2018) 773 (2018).
United States Department of State and the United States Executive Office of the President. The Long-term Strategy of the United States: Pathways to Net-Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050 (2021).
Lane, J., Greig, C. & Garnett, A. Uncertain storage prospects create a conundrum for carbon capture and storage ambitions. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 925–936 (2021).
Veil, J. U.S. Produced Water Volumes and Management Practices in 2012 (2015).
Vilarrasa, V. & Carrera, J. Geologic carbon storage is unlikely to trigger large earthquakes and reactivate faults through which CO2 could leak. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 5938–5943 (2015).
Wei, Y. M. et al. A proposed global layout of carbon capture and storage in line with a 2 °C climate target. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 112–118 (2021).
Zhang, Y., Jackson, C., Zahasky, C., Nadhira, A. & Krevor, S. European carbon storage resource requirements of climate change mitigation targets. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 114, 103568 (2022).
