COVID live updates: Greg Hunt calls on Health Department to take action against doctor who wrongly administered vaccine, and his employer
Reasons why Clive Palmer’s bid to tear down WA’s hard border was blocked by the High Court revealed
Western Australia’s hard border with the rest of Australia was justified to prevent a potentially catastrophic event, the High Court has found.
The High Court today released the reasons for its decision to allow the state’s hard border, which billionaire businessman Clive Palmer unsuccessfully claimed was “unconstitutional”, to continue.
The judgment stated there could be no doubt that a law restricting the movement of people into a state was a suitable way of preventing COVID-19 from entering a community.
If people entered WA whilst infectious, “there would be a high probability it would spread within the community and at least a moderate probability there would be uncontrolled outbreaks”.
“If there were uncontrolled outbreaks, the consequences would include the risk of death and hospitalisation, particularly for the vulnerable groups,” the judgment stated.
“In a worst-case scenario, the health consequences could be catastrophic.”
Mr Palmer was ordered to pay the state’s legal costs.